Wow. Loving all the comments. As I would expect, there is a ton of differing
opinion on which is better between drafting for talent or need. One request
though, for me. Let's keep the comments civil, shall we? If you disagree with
someone else's opinion, there is no need to call them names - we're all on the
same side, remember? This is a forum for opinion and imagination; there are no
stupid ideas. So keep the comments above the belt, thanks.
Ok, back to it. It seems to me there are two different camps of what to do if
we keep both picks. Some want us to fill our point guard needs at #3 and worry
about getting a big at #11 or through free agency. Others think a big is the way
to go at #3, and worry about a guard later. Which brings me to...
Today's question:
Which is harder to procure - a talented big or a talented point guard?
WARNING!
Just remember that none of what I say here should be
taken as evidence as to what the Hawks will actually do. I have no inside
information. So, you know what to do. Let's hear what you think in the
comments.
